Wallace: height 6'9 (around 205-207CM) weight: 240 pounds around 109KGs
Rodman: height 6'8 (around 202-203CM) weight: 243 pounds barely 110Kgs
both have been known for working out, making their money in the weight room. True hard workers, people who do everything possible to become the best they can. Wallace more predominantly for being strong through the upper body and Rodman for those crazy legs and insane core strength both have the dirty work capabilities rebounding and hustling.
lets compare their teams,
Wallace:
- WIZ/Bullets (1996–1999)
- Magic(1999–2000)
- Pistons(2000–2006)
- Bulls (2006–2008)
- Cavs (2008-2009)
- SUNS (2009)
- Pistons (1986-1993)
- Spurs (1993-1995)
- Bulls (1995-1996)
- Lakers (1999)
- Mavs (200)
Wallace:
Year | Team | G | GS | MPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% | OFF | DEF | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | TO | PF | PPG |
96-97 | WAS | 34 | 0 | 5.8 | 0.348 | 0.000 | 0.300 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.53 | 0.80 | 1.1 |
97-98 | WAS | 67 | 16 | 16.8 | 0.518 | 0.000 | 0.357 | 1.7 | 3.2 | 4.8 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.42 | 1.70 | 3.1 |
98-99 | WAS | 46 | 16 | 26.8 | 0.578 | 0.000 | 0.356 | 3.0 | 5.4 | 8.3 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 0.78 | 2.40 | 6.0 |
99-00 | ORL | 81 | 81 | 24.2 | 0.503 | 0.000 | 0.474 | 2.6 | 5.6 | 8.2 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.83 | 2.00 | 4.8 |
00-01 | DET | 80 | 80 | 34.5 | 0.490 | 0.250 | 0.336 | 3.8 | 9.4 | 13.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 1.46 | 2.40 | 6.4 |
01-02 | DET | 80 | 80 | 36.5 | 0.531 | 0.000 | 0.423 | 4.0 | 9.0 | 13.0 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 3.5 | 0.88 | 2.20 | 7.6 |
02-03 | DET | 73 | 73 | 39.4 | 0.481 | 0.167 | 0.450 | 4.0 | 11.4 | 15.4 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 3.2 | 1.21 | 2.50 | 6.9 |
03-04 | DET | 81 | 81 | 37.7 | 0.421 | 0.125 | 0.490 | 4.0 | 8.4 | 12.4 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 1.52 | 2.00 | 9.5 |
04-05 | DET | 74 | 74 | 36.1 | 0.453 | 0.111 | 0.428 | 3.9 | 8.2 | 12.2 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 1.11 | 2.10 | 9.7 |
05-06 | DET | 82 | 82 | 35.2 | 0.510 | 0.000 | 0.416 | 3.7 | 7.6 | 11.3 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 1.07 | 2.00 | 7.3 |
06-07 | CHI | 77 | 77 | 35.0 | 0.453 | 0.200 | 0.408 | 3.9 | 6.7 | 10.7 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 1.31 | 2.00 | 6.4 |
07-08 | CHI | 50 | 50 | 32.5 | 0.373 | 0.000 | 0.424 | 3.5 | 5.3 | 8.8 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 0.98 | 1.70 | 5.1 |
07-08 | CLE | 22 | 22 | 26.3 | 0.457 | 0.000 | 0.432 | 2.7 | 4.7 | 7.4 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 0.82 | 1.60 | 4.2 |
08-09 | CLE | 56 | 53 | 23.5 | 0.445 | 0.000 | 0.422 | 2.4 | 4.0 | 6.5 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0.61 | 1.50 | 2.9 |
Career | -- | 903 | 785 | 30.9 | 0.472 | 0.116 | 0.418 | 3.3 | 7.0 | 10.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 1.02 | 2.00 | 6.2 |
Year | Team | G | GS | MPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% | OFF | DEF | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | TO | PF | PPG |
1986-87 | Detroit | 77 | 1 | 15.0 | .545 | .000 | .587 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.21 | 2.20 | 6.5 |
1987-88 | Detroit | 82 | 32 | 26.2 | .561 | .294 | .535 | 3.9 | 4.8 | 8.7 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.90 | 3.30 | 11.6 |
1988-89 | Detroit | 82 | 8 | 26.9 | .595 | .231 | .626 | 4.0 | 5.4 | 9.4 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.54 | 3.60 | 9.0 |
1989-90 | Detroit | 82 | 43 | 29.0 | .581 | .111 | .654 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 9.7 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.10 | 3.40 | 8.8 |
1990-91 | Detroit | 82 | 77 | 33.5 | .493 | .200 | .631 | 4.4 | 8.1 | 12.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.15 | 3.40 | 8.2 |
1991-92 | Detroit | 82 | 80 | 40.3 | .539 | .317 | .600 | 6.4 | 12.3 | 18.7 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.71 | 3.00 | 9.8 |
1992-93 | Detroit | 62 | 55 | 38.9 | .427 | .205 | .534 | 5.9 | 12.3 | 18.3 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.66 | 3.20 | 7.5 |
1993-94 | San Antonio | 79 | 51 | 37.8 | .534 | .208 | .520 | 5.7 | 11.6 | 17.3 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.75 | 2.90 | 4.7 |
1994-95 | San Antonio | 49 | 26 | 32.0 | .571 | .000 | .676 | 5.6 | 11.2 | 16.8 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 2.00 | 3.20 | 7.1 |
1995-96 | Chicago | 64 | 57 | 32.6 | .480 | .111 | .528 | 5.6 | 9.3 | 14.9 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 2.16 | 3.10 | 5.5 |
1996-97 | Chicago | 55 | 54 | 35.4 | .448 | .263 | .568 | 5.8 | 10.2 | 16.1 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 2.02 | 3.10 | 5.7 |
1997-98 | Chicago | 80 | 66 | 35.7 | .431 | .174 | .550 | 5.3 | 9.8 | 15.0 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.84 | 3.00 | 4.7 |
1998-99 | L.A. Lakers | 23 | 11 | 28.6 | .348 | .000 | .436 | 2.7 | 8.5 | 11.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.35 | 3.10 | 2.1 |
1999-00 | Dallas | 12 | 12 | 32.4 | .387 | .000 | .714 | 4.0 | 10.3 | 14.3 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.58 | 3.40 | 2.8 |
Career | 911 | 573 | 31.7 | .521 | .231 | .584 | 4.8 | 8.4 | 13.1 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.63 | 3.10 | 7.3 |
they both had/have great careers!
in comparison, Rodman grabs 2.8 rebounds a game than Wallace he also has 1.1 more points per game and 1.5 more O boards boards a game and .5 more assists however he also averages .58 more TOs a game. but the big one is in blocking and steals in blocking wallace gets 2.3 a game too Rodman's 0.5 meaning 1.8 difference and he also has 1.3 steals a game which means he has 0.6 more steals per game than Rodman .
Awards,
Wallace:
4x NBA Defensive player of the yer (2002, 2003, 2005, 2006)
4-time NBA All Star
5-time All-NBA Team
6-time All NBA Defensive Team
1X NBA Champion
Rodman:
- 5x NBA CHAMP (1989, 1990, 1996, 1997, 1998)
- 2x All star (1990, 1992)
- 2x Defensive player of the year(1990, 1991)
- 2x all NBA third team Selection (1992, 1995)
- 7x NBA 1st defensive team Selection
- 7x NBA Rebounding Champion (1992–1998)
Rodman= more successful in championship sense as well as smashing Wallace in boards!
Wallace= better defender on ball, better single defense player however does less on offense
its a draw! so i'd put it down to succes therefore Rodman wins only because he has 5 champ rings.
No comments:
Post a Comment